Recent Changes to Part-61 and Why They Are FANTASTIC!

By Rod Machado

Am I happy about the recent changes to FAR Part 61? You bet I’m happy. These changes will be helpful to general aviation in much the same way a corkscrew is to a Frenchman on Bastille Day. Considering all the (well deserved) grief I've given the folks on the FAA's ACS committee for the past five years, it's nice to give a pat on the back to a group of individuals within the FAA for doing such a wonderful thing to promote aviation.

Before discussing these changes, let me identify what appears to be the FAA’s underlying motivation at making them. First, the FAA seems quite concerned about the cost of flight training in today’s aviation market. That’s refreshing. For this reason, the FAA offers an estimation of the cost-reduction and benefits-increase that these changes might provide for both the career-path and recreational/business aviator. Let it be said that the FAA did a good deed for general aviation with these changes. It’s a deed worthy of popping a cork or two.

So here are a few of the highlights of these recent FAR changes and my commentary. You’ll have to read then entire preamble if you want the interesting little details, which actually aren’t so little.

FTDs, ATDs AND INSTRUMENT CURRENCY
First, the FAA now allows instrument rated pilots to accomplish instrument recurrency in an FFS, FTD or ATD without having an instructor present. (A FFS is a full flight simulator. It’s the real deal. Think “Flight Safety” or “Airline training” simulators. A FTD, however, is not a machine used to deliver flowers. It’s a flight training device—think Frasca’s Piper Seminole FTD. An ATD or aviation training device is of lesser sophistication but still worthy. Think Frasca’s Cessna 172 Mentor.)

Consider the FAA’s reason for making this change. If you could retain your instrument currency with a non-CFI safety pilot in an airplane, why do you need a CFI in an ATD or FTD to do the same? Well, you don’t, or shouldn’t. Instrument “recency of experience” isn’t about training, it’s about recent “experience.” The FAA wisely suggested that instead of decreasing safety, this change will allow pilots to acquire more “experience” on their own. It will also reduce the cost of acquiring this experience and make it more likely that pilots will practice important skills such as handing equipment failures and flying different approaches in variable conditions. Bravo! Vive la Frasca! (or any other ATD, FTD manufacturer).

COMMERCIAL TRAINING AND TAAs
Second, the FAA now allows pilots to accomplish the 10 hours of required flight training for the commercial airplane certificate in either a complex airplane or a technically advanced airplane (TAA) or any combination of the two. (This rule becomes effective on August 27th of this year.) For the purposes of this discussion, the FAA considers a TAA to be an airplane with a primary flight display (PFD), a multi-function display (MFD) and a two-axis autopilot capable of holding altitude and tracking a “predetermined GPS course or heading selection and… able to hold a selected altitude.” There are many variables regarding this equipment in the NPRM, but that’s the gist of it.

That said, this ruling is FANTASTIC! Now, for those of you who know my predisposition to basic stick-and-rudder training, you might find your wheel pants in quite the bind here. So let this heretic explain why this change is so great.

Today’s commercial pilot applicant—think captain Rushmore—won’t be flying an ancient Boeing 707 accompanied by three other flight crew members who stare at a panel full of needles, numerals and toggles and worry about the life span of their vacuum-tube driven autopilot. Instead, two pilots (or one pilot and one pilot trainee) will be interfacing with an aircraft so sophisticated that it can fly itself safely to any destination with very little intervention by the interfacing specialist (the person who is still called a pilot, today). When I look at the trajectory of aviation technology, I don’t ask myself, “What do I want to see?” Instead, I ask, “What do I see?” What I see are airplanes needing less and less stick-and-rudder skill to fly while needing more interfacing skill to operate (think FMS, AI, buttonology). If that offends your romantic notion of flying airplanes, then I do feel your pain. The romantic side of me longs for pilots to retain the authority, independence and stick-and-rudder skill-set of yesterday’s commercial aviation culture. What I don’t desire is the high accident rate concomitant with yesterday’s commercial aviation culture. That’s why technology is gradually replacing cockpit participation by commercial airline pilots on several levels. You can’t have as much human error “in the cockpit” if humans don’t participate as much “in the cockpit.” (Yes, you can have other types of errors but this isn't relevant to our discussion here.) 

Clearly, the FAA recognizes this trend in aviation technology. Allowing a commercial pilot applicant to use a TAA to meet the 10-hour training requirement will assist that person in adapting to today's and tomorrow’s commercial aircraft. Yes, there are other good reasons for this change, not the least of which is the decreasing availability of complex airplanes for rent or the mechanical reliability of those same airplanes.

As the FAA sees it, a "...demonstration of proficiency in an airplane that is electronically complex will be comparable to the demonstration of proficiency in an airplane that’s mechanically complex." If you think about it carefully, that’s a very insightful statement by the FAA. Knowing how to control the landing gear and adjust propeller RPM will be a great skill to have if Southwest airlines starts operating Lockheed Constellations in lieu of 737s. However, fidelity at using complex PFD/MFDs and autopilots is a skill set more applicable to today’s and tomorrow’s commercial flying machines.

SPORT PILOT INSTRUCTORS
Finally  we come to the BIGGEST and the BEST change of all. The FAA now allows all flight training time received from a sport pilot instructor to apply toward meeting the flight time requirements for the recreational or private pilot certificate. NOTE: The only catch is (and I'm eating crow here because I didn't catch this when I originally wrote this post) the applicant applying that flight time to the private pilot certificate must already have a sport pilot certificate. Said another way, you can apply sport pilot flight time to a private pilot certificate only if you've first earned a sport pilot certificate.

For years I’ve advocated resurrecting an old (circa 1956) FAA certificate known as the Limited Flight Instructor Certificate or LFIC. This certificate allowed non-instrument rated private pilots to train others to be private pilots. The program was successful in 1956, then the FAA eliminated it for reasons having nothing to do with safety. I was a fan of the LFIC for one very important reason: Limited flight instructors were likely to train others (think friends and family) because they “wanted to do it” and not because they “had to do it” (think, “Time builders who might not be responsibly committed to training their students properly”). Well, guess what? This rule change provides us with many of the benefits of the LFIC.

As you know, you can become a sport pilot instructor with a minimum of 150 hours of flight time. This rating allows you to train others to become a sport pilot. Yes, a sport pilot instructor has to demonstrate the same ability to teach as a traditional CFI candidate (known as a “Subpart H” instructor). He or she doesn’t, however, need an instrument rating and a commercial airplane certificate. Obtaining a sport pilot instructor rating is a lot less expensive than obtaining the traditional CFI certificate. As a result of this rule change, the training provided by a sport pilot instructor in a light sport airplane can be applied to flight time requirements of the recreational or private pilot certificate (we’re assuming training in the same category and class of aircraft, of course). Therefore, the sport pilot instructor has almost the same ability as the LFIC once did. There are, however, a few restrictions to consider.

First, the sport pilot instructor can provide the instrument instruction required by the sport pilot, recreational pilot and private pilot regulations. To do so, however, the sport pilot instructor must take at least three hours of flight training and one hour of ground training on maneuvering by reference to instruments from a traditional CFI (a Subpart “H” instructor). Second, since sport pilots (and sport pilot instructors) can’t fly at night, the night training required for the private certificate must be given by a traditional CFI. Since sport pilots are not required to receive training in “recovery from unusual attitudes” while private pilots are, this training must be provided to private pilot applicants by a traditional CFI. Finally, it’s the traditional CFI that must do the three hours of flight training preparation and provide the sign off for the practical test. So no matter how skeptical you are about this change in regulation, a recreational or private pilot applicant trained by a sport pilot instructor isn’t going to escape being evaluated by a traditional CFI and pilot examiner before becoming certificated. Yes, there are many more subtleties in the preamble to these reg changes, so you might want to read it yourself…when you have time to consume 50+ pages.

Am I happy with this change? You bet I am. There’s a lot of good here for aviation and the FAA is to be commended for its logical reasoning and its ability to resist some of the well meaning but ill considered arguments offered against these regulation changes. Once again, BRAVO! Well done.

By Rod Machado | | All Rod's Posts, CFI Resource Center, Your Flying Career | 3 comments
← previous post

Comments

  • Rod Machado - July 14, 2018

    NOTE: I’m eating crow here because I read the entire 50+ page preamble to this reg and didn’t catch this when I originally wrote this post. With respect to sport pilot time being allowed for private pilot certification, the applicant applying that flight time to the private pilot certificate MUST ALREADY HAVE A SPORT PILOT CERTIFICATE. Said another way, you can apply sport pilot flight time to a private pilot certificate only if you’ve first earned a sport pilot certificate.

    I just didn’t notice that requirement. No, I’m not particularly happy about this limitation because it’s unnecessary, wasteful and seems contrary to common sense. But it’s better than what we had before.

    My apologies for not seeing this from the beginning.

    Rod Machado

  • Scott K. - July 14, 2018

    Rod,

    The way I read the actual proposed rule language for 61.99 and 61.109, instruction from a CFI-Sport will only be applicable to a higher certificate IF the candidate has first secured a sport certificate.

    Proposed 61.109: Aeronautical experience.
    *
    (l) Permitted credit for flight training received from a flight instructor with a sport pilot rating. The holder of a sport pilot certificate may credit flight training received from a flight instructor with a sport pilot rating toward the aeronautical experience requirements of this section if the following conditions are met:
    *

    That’s contrary to all the FAA’s explanatory text (and your interpretation that "The FAA now allows all flight training time received from a sport pilot instructor to apply toward meeting the flight time requirements for the recreational or private pilot certificate. ")

    That time with a CFI-Sport will only be credited IF that Private Pilot candidate first secures a Sport Pilot certificate.

    In the case where a student starts as a Sport Pilot candidate with a CFI-Sport, and then switches to the Private track, that student is screwed. None of the dual done with the CFI-Sport would apply.

    I’d love to be missing something here (as I am a CFI-Sport). Would love your thoughts on the matter.

    Thanks,
    Scott

  • Randy Whitson - July 13, 2018

    Great article Rod. I couldn’t agree more – especially with the FTD, ATD rule change. I believe this will make us all much safer due to the fact that we will able be able to practice/train more.

    Keep up the good work!

Leave a comment

Stay in Touch

Physical Product Ordering Only (800) 437-7080

If you'd like to order a PHYSICAL product by phone, please call the number above. Digital (downloadable) products can't be ordered by phone.

Latest Posts

  • Recent Changes to Part-61 and Why They Are FANTASTIC!

    By Rod Machado Am I happy about the recent changes to FAR Part 61? You bet I’m happy. These changes will be helpful to general aviation in much the same way a corkscrew is to a Frenchman on Bastille Day.... read more

  • FAR CHANGES THAT BENEFIT GENERAL AVIATION - BIG TIME!

    The FAA has just released several "final new rules" that will have a positive effect on general aviation. The FAA deserves props for these changes and I want to be the first to congratulate them. You can read the rule making... read more

  • ACS Changes? Don't Celebrate Yet

    Flight instructors! Remove those party hats, collect the confetti and deflate those balloons because this is no time to celebrate. Celebrate what? I'm speaking of celebrating the FAA's semi-reinstatement of full-stalls in the June 2018 Commercial Airplane ACS. It turns out that... read more

  • How Is Maneuvering Speed Determined?


    If you've ever wondered how engineers find an airplane's maneuvering speed, here's your chance to understand the concept in non-technical terms. That's right! No math here. Sit back, relax and let Rod Machado help you better understand Va and how... read more

  • Why Maneuvering Speed Changes With Weight


    In the previous video titled, "Understanding Maneuvering Speed," I explained how maneuvering speed helps prevent structural damage to the airplane. In this video, I explain why maneuvering speed changes with a change in the airplane's weight. You must watch the... read more

  • Why Vx & Vy Change With Altitude

    If you've ever wondered why Vx (best angle of climb speed) and Vy (best rate of climb speed) change with altitude, here's a short explanation of the concept by Rod Machado read more

  • The Proper Attitude for Making a High Density Altitude Takeoff

    Not knowing how to select the proper attitude for departure from a high density altitude airport means you might accidentally clip the top of tall pine trees near the end of the runway (or worse). This is no way to... read more

  • Teaching Students How to Think Ahead of the Airplane


    Here is a simple but very effective behavior modification technique I've used with my students over the years to train them to think ahead of the airplane. It's based on the principle of associative conditioning. Use it to train your... read more

  • Rod Machado's Five Step Teaching Process (For Any Teacher/Instructor)

    Here is a 5-Step teaching strategy that I've used for decades—both in and out of an airplane cockpit—with great success. It's useful by any teacher in any training situation because it provides a strategic approach to changing a student's behavior.... read more

  • Leaning the Mixture for a High Density Altitude Takeoff

    Here's a short video showing you several ways to lean your airplane's mixture for a high density altitude takeoff. This piece covers leaning for normally aspirated engines having fixed pitch and constant speed propellers. (www.becomeapilot.com) read more

  • Evaluating Your Glidepath With Runway Geometry

    Take a look at this video if you’d like to improve your ability to evaluate your glidepath visually. The skill shown here is an essential component of landing any airplane safely. The best part is that it’s a relatively easy... read more

  • The Runway Expansion Effect: Making the Landing Flare Easier

    Here's an easy method to help anyone identify when to begin the landing flare in a small airplane. The best part is that it requires no math or geometry skills. So, even if your name is not Euclid or Pythagoras,... read more